EU stands firm against Apple's calls to repeal the digital markets act

On September 25, 2025, the European Commission rejected Apple's request to repeal the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a regulation designed to prevent technology firms from abusing their market dominance. Apple claims that the DMA disrupts innovation and delays the introduction of new features for users, specifically citing the live translation for AirPods. Apple further argues that compliance with the DMA requires significant engineering resources, thereby hindering progress compared to other markets. The company's response to a public consultation expressed concerns that the DMA compromises user privacy and exposes them to new risks from alternative marketplace requirements. In its defense, the European Commission emphasized its commitment to preserving the DMA, outlining that it is meant to enhance competition and increase consumer choice in the tech industry. Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier highlighted that the legislation does not require companies to lower their privacy or security standards, countering Apple's assertions on potential risks. He noted that these regulations empower users rather than pose risks, making it clear that the EU sees the DMA as a crucial step in ensuring fair competition among tech companies. Apple's history with the DMA has been contentious, as it was one of the first companies penalized under the act, facing a 500 million euro fine for violating agreed-upon regulations. In its public communications, Apple indicated that the DMA has resulted in a slowdown of feature enhancements for European customers, as they now face longer development times to ensure compliance across all devices and platforms. The dialogue between Apple and the European Commission reveals the ongoing tension between large tech companies and regulatory bodies. As the DMA aims to challenge the dominance of Big Tech, companies like Apple continue to resist the provisions that they perceive as undermining their operational efficiencies. The ongoing debate reflects broader trends in global tech regulation as various governments seek to establish rules that ensure a level playing field, while tech giants advocate for more flexible guidelines that allow for innovation without stringent controls.