Apr 4, 2025, 6:00 AM
Apr 3, 2025, 12:00 AM

Eric Adams claims the deep state is real and urges reading Kash Patel's insights

Subjective
Highlights
  • Eric Adams expressed his belief that a permanent government exists that operates independently of elected officials.
  • He praised Kash Patel's book for accurately explaining the concept of the deep state.
  • Adams' statements underline concerns about accountability within powerful federal entities.
Story

In a recent podcast, New York City Mayor Eric Adams discussed the concept of the deep state while speaking with comedian Andrew Schulz. Adams, who is an influential figure in American governance, expressed his belief in the existence of a permanent government that persists regardless of elected officials. He specifically credited FBI director Kash Patel's book, 'Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy,' for its insightful analysis of this phenomenon. During the conversation, Adams emphasized that while some view the term 'deep state' as overused, he finds it to be a genuine concern that warrants attention. Adams elaborated on the role of federal entities like the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), which he described as operating with a sense of sovereignty, believing they do not need to answer to elected officials, including the president. This observation points to a significant breakdown in the accountability that such powerful offices are supposed to maintain. The sentiment expressed by Adams indicates a growing frustration with perceived unaccountability within the federal structure. Additionally, Adams mentioned his recent announcement of leaving the Democratic Party to run as an independent in his reelection campaign, suggesting a deepening divide within political affiliations. His statements about the deep state capture rising tensions around governance and public trust in institutions, reflecting broader societal concerns over the balance of power. The podcast has ignited conversations about the nature of governance, accountability, and the perceived threat of a deep state acting independently of elected officials. The implications of Adams's views on the deep state and the powerful entities under the federal umbrella could resonate far beyond local politics, affecting national discussions on governance and institutional integrity. As debates continue, the importance of public discourse on accountability and oversight remains paramount for the health of democracy.

Opinions

You've reached the end