Secret Service considers reducing protection for Jimmy Carter to aid Trump
- Rep. Mike Waltz has proposed reallocating Secret Service resources to enhance protection for individuals at greater risk.
- He suggested reducing the protective detail for former President Jimmy Carter, who is turning 100 soon, to better protect Donald Trump amid recent assassination attempts.
- Waltz emphasizes the need for accountability and a threat-based security model rather than simply increasing the agency's budget.
Rep. Mike Waltz, a member of the House Assassination Attempt task force, has suggested reallocating resources within the U.S. Secret Service to enhance protection for individuals facing greater threats. He specifically mentioned the possibility of reducing the protective detail for 99-year-old former President Jimmy Carter, who is set to turn 100 on October 1. This proposal comes amid increased scrutiny of the Secret Service following two assassination attempts against Donald Trump, the 2024 Republican nominee, during his campaign events. Waltz emphasized the need for a threat-based security model, arguing that the security measures for Trump should differ significantly from those for Carter. He criticized the agency's leadership for past failures, particularly after the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, which was prompted by the agency's inability to prevent the attacks on Trump. Waltz's recommendations include fixing existing protocols and holding leadership accountable for their shortcomings. The urgency of this situation is underscored by the recent violent incidents involving Trump, including a shooting at a rally in Pennsylvania and a standoff at a golf club in Florida. These events have raised concerns about the adequacy of the Secret Service's current protective measures and the need for a reassessment of priorities. As Congress considers additional funding for the Secret Service, Waltz advocates for real changes in the agency's operations before simply increasing its budget. His stance reflects a broader call for accountability and a more strategic approach to security for high-profile individuals, particularly those facing credible threats.