Terry Moran fired after posting anti-Trump remarks
- Terry Moran posted critical remarks about Donald Trump and Stephen Miller on social media.
- His statements led to suspension and termination from ABC News after 28 years.
- Moran's situation raises discussions about objectivity and journalistic ethics.
In June 2025, Terry Moran, a former ABC News correspondent, faced backlash after posting a critical message on social media regarding President Donald Trump and White House aide Stephen Miller. His statement described Miller as a 'world-class hater' and accused Trump of malicious intent, which led to his suspension and subsequent termination from the network after 28 years of service. Moran's comments provoked a significant response from both public and internal ABC News staff, with many expressing disappointment over what they deemed unprofessional behavior during a time when journalistic credibility was already under scrutiny. During interviews following his departure, Moran defended his right to express his views, stating that journalists should not be expected to remain entirely objective. He referenced his long tenure at ABC News, arguing that he had always aimed to provide fair and accurate information. However, he acknowledged that his post was perceived as damaging to the integrity of the network during a politically sensitive time, prompting ABC News officials to label him as 'bad for business.' His social media activity quickly escalated into a crisis for the network, which opted not to renew his contract, reinforcing the delicate balance journalists must maintain between personal expression and professional responsibilities. As Moran sought to transition from his long-standing role at ABC, he launched a Substack newsletter to engage with readers on current events and politics, attracting a considerable following. He reflected on the fear and seriousness of the consequences following his post, which changed the trajectory of his career. The incident highlights the growing tensions surrounding the expectations of journalists in today's polarized media landscape, where their personal beliefs can lead to career repercussions. The public's reaction and the fallout within ABC News exemplify the challenges that arise when journalistic credibility clashes with personal expression, raising questions about the ethical responsibilities of reporters in a politically charged environment. Ultimately, this incident serves as a case study on how social media can alter the traditional landscape of journalism. It raises important discussions on the role of journalists in political discourse, the expectations placed on them by media organizations, and the implications for freedom of speech within the profession. As the landscape changes, so too must the standards and expectations, prompting a reevaluation of what it means to be a journalist in contemporary society.