Ohio Rep. Mathews demands resignation of judge over shocking posts about Kirk's assassination
- Cincinnati Judge Ted Berry faced backlash for celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination.
- Ohio State Rep. Adam Mathews called for Berry's immediate resignation over his posts.
- Political and societal implications are driving a demand for accountability in public officials.
In Ohio, a political controversy has emerged following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, which has led to calls for the resignation of Cincinnati Judge Ted Berry. State Representative Adam Mathews (R-Lebanon) publicly condemned Berry's social media posts that celebrated Kirk's tragic death, highlighting violations of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct. Mathews asserted that the judge's remarks demonstrated a serious breach of expected impartiality and ethical standards, prompting concerns regarding public confidence in the judicial system. Rep. Mathews detailed that Berry's statements, which included racially charged and politically aggressive comments, contradicted the principles required for judges to maintain fairness in their courtrooms. Citing specific rules from the Ohio Code, Mathews pointed out that judges must uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. He indicated that such behavior was inappropriate for a figure sworn to uphold the law, and he expressed disbelief that any person could trust Berry to treat cases impartially. Furthermore, Mathews threatened to take further action should Berry choose not to step down voluntarily, including filing a formal grievance with the Ohio Supreme Court. In a related instance, John Colgan, a council member in Cornelius, Oregon, also faced backlash and resigned after making a similar post that celebrated Kirk's assassination. His comments about Kirk were widely denounced, leading to his placement on paid administrative leave from his position as a teacher in a local school. Both instances illustrate a growing concern regarding the expression of extreme political sentiments and their potential impact on public trust in local governance and the judiciary. Many have emphasized that officials must strive to maintain a standard conducive to respectful dialogue and public safety, and they are calling for accountability in the wake of such contentious remarks.