Kamala Harris tackles Supreme Court reform for justice in America

Kamala Harris has emphasized the need for Supreme Court reform, particularly in response to decisions perceived as undermining justice and civil rights. The No Kings Act, introduced in August, aims to limit presidential immunity and ensure that legal challenges are confined to the federal circuit court in Washington, D.C., without further appeals. This act reflects a broader movement among Democrats to challenge the authority of the Supreme Court, which has been criticized for its historical role in obstructing civil rights advancements. The commentary highlights the Supreme Court's legitimacy crisis, fueled by controversial rulings and ethical concerns among justices. Historical examples illustrate that the Court has often acted against the interests of marginalized groups, rather than serving as a protector of their rights. The Dred Scott decision and subsequent legislative actions, such as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, demonstrate Congress's willingness to defy the Court when necessary. Proposed reforms include jurisdiction-stripping, which would limit the Court's ability to rule on specific issues, and requiring a supermajority for the Court to declare laws unconstitutional. These measures aim to reduce the Court's power and enhance democratic accountability, ensuring that elected officials are responsible for their policy decisions without judicial interference. Ultimately, a combination of reforms could lead to a Supreme Court that functions more like other courts globally, fostering a political environment where leaders are held accountable and judicial overreach is minimized. This shift could strengthen democracy and promote a more equitable legal landscape in the United States.