Karnataka HC hears MUDA scam case as CM and Governor cancel engagements
- The Karnataka High Court began hearings on a writ petition related to the MUDA case, filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot.
- Both the Chief Minister and the Governor canceled their engagements, indicating the high stakes of the court's decision.
- The case has raised serious questions about land acquisition practices and could lead to an independent investigation, impacting the political landscape in Karnataka.
On Monday, the Karnataka High Court commenced hearings on a writ petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot regarding the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) case. Both the Chief Minister and the Governor canceled their engagements in anticipation of the court's decision, which is expected to be announced later in the day. The Chief Minister's cancellation included a visit to Mysuru and a special worship event, highlighting the significance of the case in the political landscape of Karnataka. Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi represented CM Siddaramaiah, while Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the Governor's decision to allow prosecution. The court observed that under Section 17(A) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, police investigations require prior permission, and noted that specific illegalities attributed to Siddaramaiah were not clearly outlined in the order. Arguments presented included financial discrepancies related to land acquisition, with figures cited by counsel Manindar Singh indicating a dramatic increase in land value from Rs 3.24 lakh to Rs 55 crore. This raised concerns about the need for an independent investigation into the alleged irregularities. Additionally, counsel Ranganath Reddy pointed out contradictions in Siddaramaiah's claims regarding the legality of actions taken during his tenure as Deputy Chief Minister and Chief Minister. The political implications of the case are significant, as it has drawn attention from various stakeholders in Karnataka. The outcome of the court's decision could have far-reaching consequences for the state's governance and the political careers of those involved.