Nov 28, 2024, 12:00 AM
Nov 28, 2024, 12:00 AM

U.S. weighs toned-down sanctions on China's chip suppliers

Highlights
  • Shares of major semiconductor equipment firms surged after reports indicated potential U.S. sanctions on China's chip industry might be less severe than earlier proposals.
  • ASML and Tokyo Electron experienced significant increases in stock prices as analysts suggested that excluding certain firms from sanctions could stabilize sales in China.
  • A more measured approach to U.S. sanctions could positively affect foreign semiconductor firms amidst ongoing U.S.-China technology tensions.
Story

The semiconductor industry has seen a surge in share prices due to recent developments regarding U.S. sanctions on China's chip sector. On November 28, 2024, reports indicated that the U.S. was contemplating measures that would limit sales of semiconductor equipment and AI memory chips to China but in a manner less severe than previous proposals. For instance, shares of ASML rose approximately 3.6% in early European trading, while Tokyo Electron saw an increase of more than 6% in Japan. The report suggested that the U.S. Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry declined to comment on these new measures. The potential sanctions could have significant implications for firms like ASML and Tokyo Electron, which produce essential equipment for semiconductor manufacturers. Analysts had noted that ASML was expecting a 30% revenue decline from China in the upcoming year. However, the exclusion of certain Chinese firms from the U.S. export blacklist, particularly ChangXin Memory Technologies, may lead to a less drastic reduction in ASML's sales in China. This softer approach to sanctions could be beneficial for ASML, as the exclusion of ChangXin reflects a targeted strategy focusing on specific aspects of the semiconductor supply chain. These developments come amid ongoing tensions between the U.S. and China regarding technology and trade. The semiconductor sector has been a major focal point, with both governments imposing restrictions affecting the export of crucial manufacturing equipment. For ASML, which is vital to the production of cutting-edge semiconductors, these export restrictions have created challenges in accessing the Chinese market. They rely on selling equipment to key manufacturers, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) in China. In conclusion, the U.S. is contemplating a nuanced approach to its sanctions, which could stabilize or even enhance the performance of foreign semiconductor equipment firms in the face of intensified regulatory pressures. If implemented thoughtfully, these sanctions might limit adverse effects on the industry while still addressing national security concerns about Chinese advancements in semiconductor technology.

Opinions

You've reached the end