Aug 1, 2025, 7:12 AM
Aug 1, 2025, 7:12 AM

Supreme Court ruling could lead to massive compensation for car finance mis-selling

Highlights
  • The Supreme Court is set to rule on the legality of car finance agreements with hidden commissions.
  • This ruling may affect millions of car buyers in the UK, leading to potential compensation payouts.
  • Financial expert Martin Lewis warns this decision could have extensive ramifications for the broader economy.
Story

In the United Kingdom, a critical Supreme Court decision is set to occur on August 1, 2025, regarding car finance agreements that may have included hidden commissions. This ruling stems from a significant Court of Appeal decision made the previous autumn, which deemed such agreements unlawful if they did not disclose commission details to customers. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has asserted the importance of this ruling, predicting it could establish an extensive redress scheme for affected motorists across the country. Approximately 90% of new cars in the UK are purchased via motor finance, suggesting that millions may be due compensation if the Supreme Court upholds the previous ruling. A general belief exists that up to 40% of car finance deals could potentially be affected by undisclosed commissions that benefitted brokers, leading to inflated interest rates for consumers. Following the unlawful practice's prohibition on January 28, 2021, a significant number of individuals have come forward, claiming they were overcharged before this ban took effect. The FCA is poised to consult on the specifics of a redress scheme soon after the Supreme Court announcement, crucially dependent on the outcome of the case. Notably, money expert Martin Lewis raised concerns about the potential wider economic implications, suggesting that if the ruling is not overturned, the resulting changes could disrupt consumer lending as a whole and limit access to credit for many. The FCA's need for clarity on this ruling underscores its vital role in determining the eventual form and scope of compensation for affected consumers. Thus, the ruling's ramifications may extend beyond just car finance, touching other lending sectors and raising questions about the industry's future standards and practices. In anticipation of the Supreme Court’s ruling, industry figures await clarity on whether firms like Close Brothers and Motonovo will find success in their appeals, as the immediate future of financial regulation in the automotive sector hangs in balance.

Opinions

You've reached the end