Appeals court strikes down New Jersey immigration detention law
- A New Jersey law banning cooperation with ICE for immigration detention was declared unconstitutional by a federal appeals court.
- The ruling allows CoreCivic to continue operating immigration detention facilities in New Jersey.
- This decision highlights tensions between state legislation and federal immigration policy.
In a significant legal decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a New Jersey law that restricted state and local agencies, as well as private contractors, from collaborating with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on the detention of illegal immigrants. This ruling came after New Jersey Democrats passed the law, known as AB 5207, in an effort to prevent CoreCivic, a private detention contractor, from renewing its contract to operate the Elizabeth Detention Center. The court determined that the state law infringed upon the federal government's constitutional authority to enforce immigration laws and regulate immigration detention. The court emphasized that New Jersey's law attempted to circumvent the federal government's existing legal framework by targeting the contractors that operate detention facilities instead of directly prohibiting federal action. This ruling not only permits CoreCivic to continue operations but also signifies a broader victory for federal immigration enforcement. The case has been framed in the context of ongoing immigration policy discussions and the Trump administration's initiatives aimed at expanding detention capacities in preparation for increased deportations. New Jersey's response was one of disappointment, as officials expressed concerns over the implications of privatizing immigration detention and safeguarding health and safety within state borders. Legal experts anticipate that this ruling may set a precedent for future state-federal relations regarding immigration enforcement and potential limitations on state legislation aimed at restricting federal operations.