Cancer charity reviews donations after allegations against Al Fayed
- Cancer Research UK is reviewing its relationship with the Al-Fayed Charitable Foundation after over 150 women accused Mohamed Al Fayed of sexual misconduct.
- The charity has received £45,500 in donations from the foundation since 2017, including a recent donation in 2022.
- The allegations have raised ethical concerns, prompting the charity to reconsider accepting future donations from Al Fayed's foundation.
Cancer Research UK is currently reassessing its relationship with the Al-Fayed Charitable Foundation following serious allegations against Mohamed Al Fayed, with over 150 women coming forward to accuse him of sexual misconduct. The charity has received significant donations from the foundation since 2017, totaling £45,500, including a recent donation in 2022. The allegations have intensified after a BBC documentary revealed disturbing details about Al Fayed's behavior and the alleged cover-ups by his company. The charity expressed shock at the claims, which have drawn comparisons between Al Fayed and notorious sexual predators like Jimmy Savile and Jeffrey Epstein. The revelations have prompted a broader reconsideration among various charities that have accepted funds from Al Fayed's foundation, including Zoe's Place and World Animal Protection, which have received substantial amounts over the years. In light of the allegations, Cancer Research UK stated that it takes such claims very seriously and will review its policy on accepting future donations from the Al-Fayed Charitable Foundation. The charity emphasized that past donations have been used to fund cancer research, but the current situation has raised ethical concerns about the source of these funds. As more victims come forward, the implications for charities associated with Al Fayed's foundation could be significant, potentially leading to a reevaluation of their funding sources and the reputational risks involved. The ongoing situation highlights the need for charities to carefully consider the origins of their donations in light of emerging allegations of misconduct.