Frustrated Voters Reject Major Parties for Jill Stein's Stance on Palestine
- Many voters in Paterson, New Jersey, were disillusioned with the two-party system and sought alternatives.
- Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party received support for her strong condemnation of violence in Gaza and advocacy for humanitarian issues.
- Voters hope that supporting a third-party candidate can amplify their concerns and lead to political change.
On November 5, 2024, many Arab and Muslim voters in Paterson, New Jersey, expressed discontent with traditional candidates in the U.S. election. Maged Judeh and others decided to support Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party as a way to voice their concerns about U.S. policies towards Palestine, particularly in light of ongoing violence in Gaza. Judeh characterized the political landscape as unchanging and felt that Stein offered a critical alternative by advocating for humanitarian aid and an immediate ceasefire. Throughout the day, several voters articulated their disappointment in the two-party system, perceiving no significant difference between the options presented by Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Many felt their votes could help a third-party candidate gain visibility and encourage a broader political conversation. The motivation among these voters stemmed from a desire to address humanitarian issues and challenge U.S. support for Israel's actions in Gaza.