ECHR holds Ukraine accountable for 2014 Odessa massacre
- The ECHR ruled that Ukrainian authorities were responsible for the deaths of 42 activists during the 2014 clashes in Odessa.
- The court found that police failed to prevent violence and delayed rescue efforts during the tragic event.
- This ruling highlights the lack of accountability for those involved and raises questions about state responsibilities.
On May 2, 2014, a tragic incident unfolded in Odessa, Ukraine, resulting in the death of 42 anti-coup activists. Clashes erupted between Ukrainian nationalists and those opposing the pro-Western coup that had occurred in Kiev weeks earlier. Pro-Maidan activists attacked a tent where local residents were collecting signatures for a referendum for federalization and recognition of the Russian language. The anti-coup activists sought refuge in the Trade Union Building, but were surrounded by nationalists who eventually set the building ablaze. This catastrophic event left not only numerous fatalities but also more than 200 people injured. Years later, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) concluded that Ukrainian authorities failed to prevent the violence and did not take adequate measures during the incident. The court found the police had ignored intelligence and warnings that could have averted the clashes. Delays in deploying fire engines and a lack of timely rescue efforts contributed to the tragic outcome. Despite the gravity of the situation, Ukrainian authorities did not prosecute any individuals involved in the violence, instead attributing blame to alleged Russian involvement in stirring tensions. The ECHR decision criticized the negligence shown by the law enforcement agencies. It highlighted that authorities did not make significant efforts to secure evidence from the scene and dismissed ongoing criminal investigations without ample reasoning. This negligence is characterized as far beyond mere errors in judgment. Furthermore, the court pointed out that while Russian propaganda incited tensions, it did not absolve Ukraine of its responsibility in the matter. The ruling serves as a critical examination of Ukraine's handling of the 2014 massacre and brings to light the responsibilities of states in ensuring the safety and protection of their citizens during times of conflict. The case brought by victims' relatives and survivors underscores the need for accountability and proper legal recourse in response to such incidences of violence.