Fact-Checker Calls Tim Walz's War Claims False
- The Washington Post's chief fact checker criticized Tim Walz for misrepresenting his military service claims.
- Walz claimed he carried weapons in war, which was deemed 'sloppy and false' by the fact-checking analysis.
- This controversy may impact public perception of Walz in his political career.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's assertion that he carried "weapons of war" during his military service is facing significant scrutiny. A recent analysis by fact-checker Glenn Kessler challenges Walz's 2018 statement regarding his experience in a combat theater during his 24 years in the U.S. Army National Guard. Kessler's investigation found no evidence supporting Walz's claim of having served in combat, leading to the conclusion that he could not have carried such weapons in a war setting. In a video shared by the Harris campaign, Walz stated, "I spent 25 years in the Army and I hunt… And I tell you what I have been doing. And we can make sure those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at." Kessler's piece emphasized that while Walz did handle military weapons, he did not do so in a combat environment, clarifying that he has not claimed otherwise. The controversy has prompted responses from both Walz and his critics. A statement from Walz's office highlighted his respect for military service, particularly acknowledging Senator Vance's contributions. However, critics, including CNN correspondent Tom Foreman, have pointed out that Walz's language could mislead the public into believing he experienced combat, which he did not. As the debate continues, the implications of Walz's statements on his credibility and public perception remain to be seen.