America must strengthen its social safety net to survive

In the United States, the appointment of Donald Trump's cabinet positions has sparked significant concern due to the lack of relevant experience among his nominees. Individuals such as Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, Kash Patel for FBI Director, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for overseeing health care policies have raised eyebrows among political analysts and the public alike. Many critics note that Trump's choices deviate sharply from traditional standards and norms witnessed over a century in American politics. These appointments are perceived not just as isolated decisions but part of a broader trend where leaders worldwide attack and undermine key institutions of the state, an alarming pattern evident in countries like Hungary and Israel. These attacks on modern state institutions are seen as dangerous as they tend to enrich the loyalists while simultaneously weakening independent sources of expertise. As these institutions are compromised, they pave the way for alternative political orders, often characterized by patronage systems where leaders appoint their loyalists based on personal loyalty rather than qualifications. Such shifts pose a threat not only to the functionality of governance but also to the integrity of democracy itself. The broader implications of such a trend, as seen globally, show that undermining foundational institutions can destabilize nations and diminish public trust in their governmental systems. Furthermore, the political climate that supports such appointments suggests a willingness to prioritize personal connections over qualified governance. Critics argue that this approach to political appointments not only risks the stability of public policies but can also lead to a patronage-like system that diminishes the role of expertise in governance. Such an environment may foster disillusionment about government effectiveness and could threaten the operational efficacy of essential state functions, especially in times of crisis. Ultimately, concerns regarding the experience and qualifications of Trump's appointees highlight the potential consequences of prioritizing loyalty over expertise, emphasizing a need for vigilance to protect democracy's foundations. Acknowledging the importance of qualified leadership is crucial for safeguarding public services and ensuring effective governance in the long run.