Victor Davis Hanson predicts a likely deal between Russia and Ukraine

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has continued to draw attention globally, particularly following a series of discussions and political maneuvers involving key players. Recently, Victor Davis Hanson, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, articulated his views on the situation during an appearance on The Guy Benson Show. He emphasized the potential for an agreement between the two nations in light of the current geopolitical climate. Hanson highlighted Donald Trump's recent talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Italy, asserting that Trump's approach could apply significant pressure on Russia to negotiate. Hanson discussed Trump's potential strategy of using secondary boycotts as a tool to influence the outcome of the negotiations. This method could strategically affect Russia's economy, compelling it to reconsider its position in the ongoing war. The former president's stance on tariffs and trade deals is also seen as a lever that could positively impact future relations between the United States, Ukraine, and Russia. Hanson's insights suggest that Trump’s administration might provide a framework that could lead to a resolution, contrasting with current Democratic policies. The unstable political climate further complicates the situation, with Hanson's remarks touching on the Democrats' inconsistent approaches to lawfare and their perceived ineffectiveness in foreign policy strategies, particularly in Latin America. He criticized their efforts, particularly regarding their engagement with countries like El Salvador and their responses to Trump’s actions, accusing them of being tone-deaf. This criticism reflects a broader narrative about the need for coherent policy responses to international challenges and demonstrates an ongoing divide in U.S. political discourse surrounding foreign relations. Ultimately, Hanson's argument rests on a belief that a future under Trump's influence could foster a more favorable environment for resolving the war in Ukraine. Despite various challenges, he holds that diplomatic avenues remain viable, and that negotiations could yield positive outcomes if conducted strategically. The implications of these discussions are significant, not just for Russia and Ukraine, but for global stability as well.