Tourist denied entry to the U.S. over drug use claims despite viral meme story
- Mads Mikkelsen, a Norwegian tourist, was denied entry into the U.S. due to his admission of previous drug use.
- The story went viral after claims circulated that he was questioned about a meme of Vice President J.D. Vance found on his phone.
- U.S. border policies have intensified scrutiny of travelers, leading to increased denials and concerns over civil liberties.
On June 11, 2025, a traveler named Mads Mikkelsen was denied entry into the United States at Newark Liberty International Airport. The incident began when U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) questioned him about his mobile device, which led to claims that he was threatened with criminal charges for not providing his phone password. Mikkelsen alleged that officials found a meme depicting Vice President J.D. Vance on his phone and used it as a reason for heightened scrutiny. However, CBP and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) firmly denied that the meme played any role in their decision. Instead, they asserted that Mikkelsen was turned away due to his acknowledgment of prior drug use and possession of drug paraphernalia, including a handmade wooden pipe. Tighter immigration control policies have become prevalent under the Trump administration, leading to intensified scrutiny of foreigners entering the U.S. Reports have surfaced about increased investigations of travelers and the introduction of social media screening by immigration authorities. These measures aimed at combating terrorism and drug-related crimes have raised concerns among citizens of various countries, prompting travel advisories and warnings about potential harassment at U.S. borders. The case highlights broader implications for international travelers, as many are now hesitant to visit the U.S. due to fears of invasive questioning or detainment. The situation reflects a shift in U.S. border enforcement strategies, where even benign social media content may trigger an escalation of scrutiny. Despite the controversial nature of these policies, federal officials maintain that their primary goal is to enhance national security. As Mikkelsen's experience has spread across social media, it has sparked discussions about civil liberties, travel freedoms, and the potential for government overreach. The legality of invasive checks, especially those involving personal digital devices, has been called into question, highlighting the delicate balance between security concerns and individual rights. The story serves as a cautionary tale for travelers regarding the potential risks of scrutiny and denial of entry at the U.S. border, emphasizing the need for individuals to remain vigilant and informed.