Trump appoints art collector with no military experience to lead U.S. Navy
- John Phelan, a GOP megadonor, has been nominated by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the U.S. Navy despite lacking military experience.
- Phelan has previously donated heavily to Trump's campaign and hosted fundraising events, raising concerns about the influence of political donations on military appointments.
- The decision highlights a trend in Trump’s nominations of prioritizing loyalty and political alignment over military qualifications, raising concerns among veterans.
In a move that has generated significant controversy, President-elect Donald Trump has selected John Phelan to lead the U.S. Navy. This nomination comes during a broader appointment process in which Trump is seeking to fill his administration with loyal supporters. Phelan, a well-known GOP megadonor with no military background, made headlines for his extensive fundraising efforts, including a $834,600 contribution to Trump's joint fundraising committee and hosting a lavish dinner at his Aspen, Colorado estate, which raised $12 million for the campaign. His selection was reportedly made following a series of interviews at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, showcasing Trump's continued focus on the “America First vision.” Phelan's background includes leading a private investment firm and oversight of investments for tech entrepreneur Michael Dell. Despite this, critics have pointed out his lack of relevant experience for the role, with seasoned veterans expressing concern over the appointment of someone heavily involved in politics rather than military service. Notably, Phelan's nomination stands alongside the consideration of other candidates who possess more traditional military experience. The implications of this choice reflect a broader trend within Trump's nominations, emphasizing loyalty and alignment with his agenda over established qualifications. This approach has raised alarms among military personnel and advocates who fear that such political appointments could undermine the operational integrity and leadership of the U.S. Navy. Trump has previously voiced frustration with military leadership and has a history of potentially controversial proposals, including using military resources for immigration enforcement, indicating a potential shift in how military priorities may be aligned with the administration's objectives.