Ohio governor DeWine signs controversial budget funding new Browns stadium

In Ohio, Governor Mike DeWine signed a two-year operating budget totaling $60 billion, just before the midnight deadline on a Monday night. This budget includes substantial provisions such as a flattened income tax and a significant allocation of $600 million from unclaimed funds for the construction of a new stadium for the Cleveland Browns football team. Although DeWine argued that this budget is a proactive financial move to benefit taxpayers, it has received mixed reactions from both sides of the political aisle. The budget aims to simplify the income tax rate, phasing in a flat rate of 2.75% over the next two years for those earning above $26,050, while those making less than this threshold will continue to pay no income tax. Additionally, DeWine issued 67 line-item vetoes during his signing, which is notable as it marks the highest number of vetoes since he took office in 2019. Among the vetoed items were those that attempted to limit the funding for homeless shelters associated with social gender transition issues and regulations concerning public library materials related to sexual orientation and gender identity. He also rejected measures that would have restricted school districts' financial reserves and identified local school board candidates by partisan labels on ballots. His actions reflect a significant push towards fiscal reform as advocated by his administration. The budget was approved by the Republican-controlled state legislature, reflecting a party initiative to enhance financial relief through tax strategies and spending reductions in administrative sectors. Leaders praised the plan for its approach toward addressing Ohio's property tax crisis and bolstering support for sports teams that may seek facility upgrades, like the Browns, who have shown interest in a new facility in suburban Brook Park. However, the proposal has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers, who labeled it a financial boon for wealthier interests at the expense of essential public services, given the allocation of state funds to a billionaire-owned sports franchise. Many saw this as an inappropriate use of state resources. The Cleveland Browns organization hailed the budget as a significant milestone, claiming it contributes positively to the community. Moreover, following the budget's signing, those opposing its implications threatened legal action against DeWine, arguing that redirecting unclaimed funds for stadium construction violates due process rights. DeWine and his administration, however, viewed this budget as a critical step towards improving the overall quality of life in Ohio, emphasizing the long-term benefits that the new stadium could bring to the local economy and community engagement in sports. This situation highlights ongoing debates in Ohio over resource allocation, taxation, and government spending priorities, revealing deep divisions in public opinion and political perspectives.