Aug 20, 2024, 4:15 PM
Aug 20, 2024, 12:00 AM

Food Industry Pushes Back Against Harris's Inflation Claims and Price Control Proposals

Left-Biased
Highlights
  • The food industry denounces Vice President Kamala Harris for her Soviet-style price control proposal.
  • Harris blames high inflation on corporate greed under the Biden-Harris administration.
  • Critics warn that the proposal could have negative implications on the economy.
Story

The food industry has expressed strong disapproval of Vice President Kamala Harris's recent comments attributing high inflation to corporate greed and her proposal for price controls on food and groceries. Andrew Harig, a vice president at the Food Marketing Institute (FMI), emphasized that while consumers are understandably frustrated by rising prices, attributing these increases solely to corporate malfeasance oversimplifies the issue. Industry leaders argue that their rising costs are largely due to increased wages and supply chain challenges, not excessive profit margins. Harris's call for a federal ban on grocery price gouging has been met with skepticism, with the National Grocers Association labeling it a "solution in search of a problem." They highlighted that their members are also grappling with inflationary pressures, suggesting that the proposed measures could exacerbate rather than alleviate the situation. Critics have drawn parallels between Harris's proposals and economic policies seen in authoritarian regimes, with Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary warning against the potential consequences of such controls. Bob Unanue, CEO of a major Hispanic-owned food company, voiced concerns that Harris's economic strategies could severely damage the U.S. economy, claiming that the Biden-Harris administration has waged a "war" on the middle class. Former President Donald Trump echoed these sentiments, stating that rising grocery prices are influencing voter sentiment, with data showing prices nearly 30 percent higher than in 2019. He cautioned that price controls could lead to rationing and increased hunger, further complicating the economic landscape.

Opinions

You've reached the end