Protests lead to resignation of Nepal's Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli
- Widespread protests erupted in Kathmandu in September 2025 due to frustrations over youth unemployment and corruption.
- The protests culminated in the resignation of Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli, as tensions and violence escalated.
- The Gen Z movement continues to call for a thorough cleanup of the government and greater representation in political leadership.
Nepal has witnessed unprecedented protests as the youth-led Gen Z movement erupted in response to rising corruption and youth unemployment. On Tuesday, September 9, 2025, tens of thousands took to the streets of Kathmandu, fueled by anger over the disparity between the Nepalese elite and ordinary citizens. The protests escalated dramatically, marked by incidents of violence including arson targeting government buildings such as the Supreme Court, and clashes with police that resulted in fatalities. Protesters expressed their demands for accountability from those in power, particularly focusing on the lavish lifestyles of politicians and their families. Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli faced immense pressure from the discontented populace, eventually announcing his resignation during a Cabinet meeting at his residence. He cited an “extraordinary situation” as his reason for stepping down, aiming to facilitate a political resolution after the devastating events that unfolded. As the protests continued, many participants, aged between 13 to 28, sought greater representation and leadership aligned with their values and goals. The resignation did not pacify the protesters, who were concerned about the entrenched political system that had allowed corruption to flourish. President Ramchandra Paudel urged for cooperation among stakeholders to bring about a peaceful resolution, recognizing that the situation was not just about the resignation of Oli but reflected deep-rooted societal issues. The youth movement, characterized by its effective use of social media, gained momentum following a social media ban, which many young people saw as a tipping point. With public sentiment increasingly siding with the protesters, the atmosphere of uncertainty engendered fear among some who worried about potential reprisals against those who demonstrated peacefully. Despite the current calm after Oli's exit, many young activists demand systemic changes and the dismissal of other corrupt officials. They express skepticism regarding the ongoing leadership discussions led by President Paudel and call for a more responsive government that addresses the concerns of the youth, especially regarding economic opportunities amid a staggering 20.8% youth unemployment rate reported by the World Bank. The movement, reflective of larger shifts in political engagement among younger generations, remains active and continues to voice concerns for their future in a nation grappling with political and economic instability.