Investigation launched after sergeant at arms calls for backup during council meeting
- Councilman Khari Mosley calls for an investigation into Sergeant at Arms John Svitek's actions during a recent heated public hearing.
- During the public hearing, emotions ran high as community members urged the council to maintain funding for Stop Violence Grants.
- The incident, characterized as a miscommunication rather than an overreaction, highlights ongoing concerns about community access to local governance.
In the United States, an internal investigation is underway regarding a sergeant at arms of the Pittsburgh City Council. This investigation stems from an incident that occurred last week during a public hearing where emotions were high over the future of Stop Violence Grants. Councilman Khari Mosley and Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle expressed concerns that the actions taken by John Svitek, the sergeant at arms, were excessive when he summoned backup, citing safety concerns in a crowded chamber. The situation escalated as half a dozen sheriff deputies responded to the call, leading to debates over whether such a measure was appropriate. During the hearing, speakers passionately advocated for the grants, asserting their importance for the community. Mosley criticized the perceived lack of safety measures for community members who come to address the council, stating that calling for backup could deter constituents from participating in local governance. Other council members, however, defended Svitek's response as a misunderstanding rather than an overreaction. Council member Anthony Coghill noted that the chamber had exceeded its capacity and that some individuals obstructed access by congregating behind the council table. While Svitek is not present during the latest council session, the discussion about the backup request raised specific critiques about how passions and community advocacy are handled in council chambers. Tim Stevens, CEO of the Black Political Empowerment Project, stood by the notion that the sergeant in arms should better differentiate between passionate advocacy and potentially threatening behavior. This incident led to calls for policy and procedural reviews to prevent similar miscommunications in the future. Despite the tensions, there was a consensus among some council members that the matter should have been addressed more privately with Svitek prior to opening a public investigation. Council member Theresa Kail-Smith emphasized the sergeant's dedication and reliability, asserting that he would willingly protect the council and its members. Moving forward, the Department of Public Safety has announced that an internal review is in progress, examining radio communications and any relevant video footage to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to address the future handling of crowd management in council meetings.