Ian McKellen"s theater critic faces challenges in 1930s London

Set in 1930s London, Ian McKellen portrays Jimmy Erskine, a seasoned theater critic whose reviews hold significant power over the success of plays and performers. His commitment to truth in criticism is unwavering, but it isolates him from others, as he believes he must remain detached from the public. This detachment is challenged when he faces scrutiny from a new newspaper boss, David Brooke, who urges him to adopt a kinder approach in his reviews. Erskine's refusal to soften his critiques leads to tension, particularly with actress Nina Land, who confronts him about his contradictory assessments of her performances. As the narrative unfolds, the film explores the precarious position of a critic whose authority is threatened by changing dynamics in the theater world and the rise of fascist ideologies. Erskine's character is depicted as a once-respected figure who has become increasingly delusional, struggling to maintain his relevance in a shifting landscape. His open secret of being gay adds another layer of complexity to his character, especially in light of the societal pressures of the time. Despite its ambitious attempt to weave together multiple storylines, the film ultimately falls short in character development, leaving audiences disconnected from the supporting cast. The film's trajectory shifts from satire to tragedy, highlighting the desperate measures Erskine takes to protect his position and identity. While the performances, particularly McKellen's, are commendable, the film's execution does not fully realize its intriguing premise. In conclusion, the film presents a critical look at the life of a theater critic, revealing the personal and professional challenges he faces. It raises questions about the nature of criticism, the impact of societal change, and the lengths one will go to preserve their legacy in the arts.