Independent voters shape election outcomes across key states
- Polls show Kamala Harris leading among independent voters in most swing states, except Arizona, where Trump has a significant lead.
- In Pennsylvania, the economy is the top issue for independents, with a notable percentage remaining undecided or considering third-party options.
- The diverse priorities of independent voters across states indicate that candidates must adapt their strategies to address local concerns effectively.
As the presidential debate approaches, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are focusing on independent voters, a crucial demographic that can sway election outcomes. Polls indicate that Harris leads among independents in most swing states, except for Arizona, where Trump has a significant advantage. In Pennsylvania, Harris holds a narrow lead of 5 points, but a notable portion of independent voters remain undecided or are considering third-party candidates, highlighting a potential opportunity for both candidates. The economy emerges as the primary concern for independent voters in Pennsylvania, with 58% prioritizing it over other issues. This is higher than the general population's concern, indicating that economic policies may play a pivotal role in influencing voter decisions. Additionally, 13% of independents in Pennsylvania express concern over threats to democracy, which is also a significant issue for them. In Arizona, independent voters show a different set of priorities, with only 27% citing the economy as their top issue. Instead, immigration takes precedence for 25% of independents, reflecting the state's unique demographic and political landscape. Housing affordability and threats to democracy are also notable concerns among Arizona independents, indicating a diverse range of issues that candidates must address. Florida's independent voters prioritize abortion access slightly more than the statewide average, while the economy remains a top concern for a third of voters. The varied priorities among independent voters across these states suggest that candidates must tailor their messages to resonate with local issues to effectively engage this influential group.