Energy Transfer fights $2.5 million fine after deadly pipeline incident

In the United States, Energy Transfer LP, a prominent pipeline company known for the Dakota Access Pipeline, has been under fire due to a series of safety violations and incidents. Among its significant troubles, the company faced a $2.5 million fine from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) in 2023 after a tragic accident in 2020, which resulted in the death of a pipeline worker. The company has contested this fine, arguing that the incident was not due to negligence from their side but rather an unforeseen accident. Thus, the enforcement action is still pending resolution. Energy Transfer has gained notoriety for legal battles against both activists and journalists who have protested against its operations. In 2016, the Dakota Access Pipeline ignited a major Indigenous-led resistance at Standing Rock, leading to widespread protests highlighting issues of environmental racism and activism against fossil fuel projects. Despite these controversies, Energy Transfer and its CEO, Kelcy Warren, emerged as significant contributors to political campaigns, notably supporting President Donald Trump financially during his presidency. In fact, they were the top donors to a super PAC supporting Trump in 2025, contributing a total of $25 million. Trump's administration was marked by a strong pro-fossil fuel stance, with efforts to deregulate the industry. After taking office, he issued executive orders that significantly undermined regulatory enforcement. Enforcement rates of safety violations against pipeline companies, such as Energy Transfer, have notably decreased since Trump assumed the presidency. This drop in enforcement has raised concerns amongst safety advocates, as a lack of oversight can potentially lead to increased incidents within the industry, risking both communities and the environment. Leaders within watchdog organizations argue that persistent non-enforcement of rules further prioritizes profits over safety. As of now, new safety regulations are being contemplated by PHMSA, albeit slower than desired, and the lack of transparency surrounding this process continues to alarm various stakeholders. The ongoing legal trials and disputes reflect the balancing act between regulatory oversight, fossil fuel production demands, and the practical safety of the public and environment. Many believe it is critical for enforcement to be robust and for companies to be held accountable for their safety practices.