FCC approves SpaceX"s upgrade plan for Starlink satellites
- The FCC has modified SpaceX's license to allow the replacement of first-generation Starlink satellites with larger, upgraded models.
- The new Gen1 satellites will utilize advanced technology for more efficient broadband capacity through narrower beams.
- This decision enables SpaceX to enhance its satellite internet service while addressing concerns about potential interference.
On August 16, the Federal Communications Commission modified SpaceX's license, allowing the company to replace its first-generation Starlink satellites with larger, upgraded models. This modification enables the deployment of Gen1 satellites equipped with advanced beam-forming and digital processing technology, which will enhance broadband capacity through narrower beams. SpaceX currently operates 6,325 Starlink satellites, including 4,216 Gen1 units, and aims to deploy nearly 30,000 Gen2 satellites in the future. The upgraded Gen1 satellites will weigh around 300 kilograms, significantly lighter than the 800-kilogram Gen2 satellites planned for deployment with the Starship rocket. The FCC's decision comes despite objections from Dish Network, which raised concerns about potential interference with other communication systems. The FCC dismissed these concerns, stating that the new technology would allow for more focused communication, thus complying with existing satellite power limits. SpaceX's strategy involves utilizing its Gen1 license to gradually introduce these upgraded satellites while also preparing for the launch of its Gen2 constellation. The company has been actively launching Starlink satellites since 2019 and has plans to expand its network significantly. The modification of the license is a crucial step in enhancing the efficiency and capacity of SpaceX's satellite internet service. Additionally, SpaceX is required to negotiate with the National Science Foundation to address the impact of its satellites on optical ground-based astronomy. This condition reflects the ongoing need to balance technological advancement with the preservation of scientific observation capabilities.