Trump sues Murdoch and WSJ for $10 billion over Epstein allegations

In the United States, Donald Trump has initiated a libel lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch, the owner of News Corp, and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) following the publication of an article that accused him of sending a suggestive birthday card to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami on July 18, 2025, seeks $10 billion in damages and names multiple defendants, including two journalists who worked on the story. Trump has outright denied the allegations and claims that the letter attributed to him does not exist. The case has stirred significant media interest due to the high-profile nature of both the parties involved and the sensitive subject matter. Trump took to social media to express his intentions for a jury trial and to emphasize his belief that the letter published by WSJ was fake and damaging to his reputation. Dow Jones, the publisher of WSJ, has publicly defended its reporting, asserting confidence in its accuracy and promising a vigorous defense. Amidst a backdrop of political tensions and Trump's history of litigating against media outlets, this lawsuit is viewed as part of his ongoing battle against what he perceives as unfair media practices. It is important to note that the judge overseeing the case, Darrin P. Gayles, was appointed by former President Barack Obama, which could influence perceptions of the trial's fairness. The legal implications of the lawsuit might extend beyond the immediate parties, showcasing the complexities of defamation law and the interactions between public figures and the press. Trump’s previous disputes with media organizations have set a precedent, as he has previously filed lawsuits against multiple outlets over various claims. The report from WSJ has additionally provoked questions regarding Trump's past relationships and interactions with Epstein, especially given the increased focus on the latter's criminal history and connections to high-profile figures. Observers are closely monitoring the development of this case, as it may impact not only Trump’s political future but also raise questions about the responsibilities of the media in reporting on public figures.