Gorsuch's Critique of Federal Authority
- Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has published a book examining the expansive and largely unchecked power of the federal bureaucracy.
- He echoes concerns raised by former President Barack Obama regarding the size of federal authority.
- Gorsuch's work is a critical exploration of how federal power can operate beyond review and accountability.
In a recent adaptation from "Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law," authors Neil Gorsuch and Janie Nitze explore the complexities of bureaucratic systems and their impact on public engagement. The essay highlights a frustrating experience involving the Interior and Commerce Departments, which manage salmon in different water environments. This situation exemplifies the confusion and inefficiency that can arise from overlapping governmental responsibilities. The narrative follows an individual attempting to schedule an appointment, only to be redirected multiple times between offices, ultimately leading to a dead end. The lack of accountability and clear communication within the bureaucracy is evident, as the individual is told to wait weeks for a response, illustrating the challenges citizens face when navigating government processes. This experience raises critical questions about the erosion of public participation and the growing reliance on experts to dictate actions. Gorsuch and Nitze invoke the thoughts of philosopher Hannah Arendt, who warned of a society where individuals feel powerless to voice grievances or challenge authority. This "rule by Nobody" creates a scenario where citizens become disengaged, leading to a form of tyranny devoid of a clear oppressor. The authors argue that such apathy threatens the very fabric of democratic engagement and civic responsibility. Ultimately, the essay serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of bureaucratic indifference and the importance of fostering an active and participatory public life.