Investors warned as class action deadlines approach for Quantum Computing and AppLovin
- Rosen Law Firm encourages investors of Quantum Computing Inc. to join the class action before the April 28, 2025 deadline.
- The lawsuit alleges that Quantum Computing made misleading statements about its technology and contracts, causing financial harm to investors.
- Investors are urged to act quickly to secure legal counsel and protect their rights in these pending class actions.
In New York, on April 4, 2025, Rosen Law Firm announced important deadlines for the investors of two companies: Quantum Computing Inc. and AppLovin Corporation. The firm urged investors of Quantum Computing who purchased shares between March 30, 2020, and January 15, 2025, to take action before the April 28, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline. According to the firm, those who bought securities during this class period may be entitled to compensation. The lawsuit claims that Quantum Computing made numerous false and misleading statements affecting investor decisions, leading to widespread financial damages when the truth emerged. In the same announcement, Rosen Law Firm also reminded purchasers of AppLovin Corporation securities between May 10, 2023, and February 25, 2025, of their rights to file claims before the May 5, 2025, deadline to serve as lead plaintiff. The claims against AppLovin involve allegations of misleading investors regarding the financial stability and growth potential of the company, particularly concerning its AXON 2.0 digital ad platform and the company’s marketing practices. False statements and undisclosed practices allegedly resulted in misleading figures presented to investors, spurring potential legal repercussions once inaccuracies became known. The Rosen Law Firm, recognized as a global leader in investor rights, emphasizes the importance of participating in these pending class actions while also cautioning against firms that may not have adequate experience or resources to manage these cases effectively. Investors are encouraged to reach out to the law firm for further assistance and to ensure their rights are protected. As the firm highlights, investors must act quickly to join these class actions as the corresponding deadlines approach, underscoring the urgency of the situation as it may affect numerous individuals who invested in either company. These circumstances illustrate the vital role investor rights law firms play in helping individuals navigate complex securities litigation. The outcomes of these cases will be closely monitored by affected investors as precedents in corporate governance and accountability may emerge from the resulting litigation. Such developments could have larger implications not only for Quantum Computing and AppLovin but for the overall investor landscape in technology securities as transparency becomes increasingly scrutinized.