Michigan judge loses cases after anti-gay and racist remarks
- Oakland County Probate Judge Kathleen Ryan was recorded making anti-gay and racist remarks, leading to her removal from handling cases.
- Court official Edward Hutton reported her behavior after secretly recording their phone calls over several years.
- The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission is investigating the allegations, raising concerns about judicial impartiality and accountability.
In Pontiac, Michigan, Oakland County Probate Judge Kathleen Ryan was removed from her docket on August 27 due to misconduct after being recorded making derogatory remarks about gay individuals and Black people. The recordings were made by court official Edward Hutton, who felt compelled to report her behavior to ensure fairness in the court system. Hutton had been receiving calls from Ryan for years, which he secretly recorded and later shared with various officials, including the county's highest elected official, David Coulter, who is gay. Ryan's comments included using an anti-gay slur and referring to Black individuals as lazy, which raised serious concerns about her ability to serve impartially as a judge. Following the whistleblower report, Chief Probate Judge Linda Hallmark suspended Ryan with pay while the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission investigates the allegations. Ryan, who has been in office since 2010, has stated through her attorneys that they look forward to vindicating her in the appropriate legal forum. The situation has sparked discussions about systemic issues within the judiciary and the importance of accountability for judges. Hutton expressed his desire for the people of Oakland County to receive fair treatment in court, emphasizing the need for an unbiased judicial process. The case highlights the potential consequences of personal biases affecting judicial responsibilities and the importance of maintaining integrity within the legal system. As the investigation unfolds, the implications of Ryan's remarks and the actions taken by Hutton may lead to broader discussions about judicial conduct and the standards expected of those in positions of authority. The outcome will likely influence public trust in the judicial system in Oakland County and beyond.