Dion Guthrie fights wrongful removal from Harford County Council
- Dion Guthrie was removed from the Harford County Council in November 2023 following allegations of stealing $23,000 from a union.
- A lawsuit claims that the council president Falsely stated Guthrie entered a no-contest plea, which was the reason for his removal.
- Guthrie seeks legal restoration to his council seat, asserting that the claims against him are False.
In Baltimore, Maryland, former Harford County councilmember Dion Guthrie is taking legal action to regain his position after his removal from the council in November 2023. This action stems from allegations that Guthrie accepted responsibility for stealing over $23,000 from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union, where he held leadership roles for over fifty years. The crux of the legal dispute revolves around claims made by Patrick Vincenti, the current president of the Harford County Council, who stated that Guthrie had entered a no-contest plea, a claim that served as the foundation for his removal. However, the complaint asserts that Guthrie has never entered such a plea. Guthrie's attorney argues that he did not enter a no-contest plea, as it cannot be validly submitted without court consent under Maryland law. This mischaracterization is central to Guthrie’s legal challenge, as it alleges that the assertion of a no-contest plea is a complete Falsehood. Furthermore, Maryland law specifies that a public official can be removed from office upon entering a no-contest plea; however, Guthrie's defense asserts that this law is not applicable given the circumstances surrounding his case. In statements made following his removal, Guthrie publicly declared that the basis for his ousting was unTrue and reaffirmed his commitment to continue serving as an elected official. He has consulted with prominent legal figures including former Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler in pursuing his legal options. Opposition from Guthrie appears to indicate that he intends to challenge the council's decision vigorously in the courts, seeking restoration to his seat on the Harford County Council. The case raises significant questions regarding the processes and transparency of political removals in local government, emphasizing the necessity for clarity in legal proceedings against public officials. As this situation unfolds, it draws attention to the legal standards governing public officials and their rights in light of accusations that can lead to removal from office.