Trump continues failed military strategy against the Houthis
- The USS Harry S. Truman conducted operations near Yemen, facing missile threats from the Houthis.
- The U.S. continues to employ traditional military strategies that have previously been criticized.
- Experts are calling for a reevaluation of naval warfare tactics to address modern threats.
In recent months, the U.S. Navy has been engaged in operations against the Houthi terrorist group in Yemen, utilizing aircraft carriers as a primary power projection platform. The USS Harry S. Truman, a Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, was operational off the coast of Yemen amidst heightened tensions. Reports indicate that the carrier narrowly avoided a Houthi missile attack, underlining the increasing threats faced by American military forces in the region. Despite these dangers, the U.S. appeared to maintain a strategy reminiscent of previous administrations, continuing carrier presence and airstrikes that have failed to diminish the Houthi's ability to launch attacks. The situation has led to growing concerns among military analysts regarding the effectiveness of traditional naval strategies against non-state actors possessing missile capabilities. Moreover, incidents of friendly fire, such as the downing of a U.S. Navy electronic warfare plane by friendly forces, reflect the chaotic environment in which the Navy is operating. Experts argue that reliance on carriers may be outdated, proposing a reassessment of military tactics in light of the evolving landscape of maritime warfare. With the Houthis reportedly improving their anti-ship warfare techniques, the question arises whether American leaders will change their approach before a catastrophic incident occurs involving an aircraft carrier.