California's sanctuary law exceeded by Jerry Brown's own admissions
- Jerry Brown noted in an interview that California has expanded sanctuary policies beyond the original law's intent.
- He pointed out that cities like San Francisco have created a significant barrier between state and federal immigration policy.
- Brown concluded that current practices might be difficult to sustain while emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to immigration.
In a recent interview with Sacramento's ABC10, former California Governor Jerry Brown reflected on the current state of sanctuary policies in California. These policies were meant to provide a safe haven for undocumented immigrants, and Brown acknowledged that the state has expanded far beyond the limits of the sanctuary state law he enacted. He pointed to cities such as San Francisco which, according to him, have taken actions well beyond what is necessary, essentially creating a separation between state and federal regulations on immigration. Brown emphasized that the original law included exceptions for individuals convicted of serious and violent crimes, which meant that not every undocumented immigrant could expect protection under these laws. He criticized the federal government's tactics as overreaching and suggested that California should focus on state-level management of immigration rather than imitating approaches seen in states like Texas. He expressed concern regarding the implications of these broader policies and noted that there is a growing consensus among Democrats urging the necessity for better border control and a systematic approach to immigration. Brown’s remarks highlight ongoing tensions between state and federal government regarding immigration enforcement and policy, as well as the evolving landscape of the political discourse on this contentious issue among lawmakers and local governments in California.