EU Stakeholders Debate Breton's Nuclear Energy Regulation Proposal
- Nuclear defenders are divided on whether to advocate for a dedicated EU regulation for nuclear energy.
- Some believe in normalizing nuclear power without special treatment, while others call for a Nuclear Act to strengthen the sector.
- The future of a Nuclear Act remains uncertain following the departure of its main proponent, Thierry Breton.
The debate surrounding nuclear energy regulation in the EU has intensified, with stakeholders expressing differing opinions on the best approach. Proponents of nuclear power agree that European law should not discriminate against nuclear energy compared to renewable sources. Some advocates suggest a focus on normalizing nuclear energy, while others, including French MEP Christophe Grudler, emphasize the need for a dedicated Nuclear Act to ensure strong commitments from incoming EU Commissioners. Thierry Breton, the former Internal Markets Commissioner, initially proposed the Nuclear Act, aiming to foster European research and innovation in safe nuclear technologies and promote cross-border projects. However, following his departure from the Commission in September 2021, the future of this initiative has become uncertain. Valérie Faudon, General Delegate of the French Nuclear Energy, argues for a comprehensive approach that would amend existing European laws to eliminate perceived discrimination against nuclear energy. Some stakeholders express caution, suggesting that singling out nuclear energy may not be the best strategy. Instead, they propose integrating nuclear energy into broader initiatives, such as the upcoming Clean Industrial Deal. This reflects a desire to support nuclear energy without drawing excessive attention to it. As the EU navigates its energy policies, the discussions surrounding the Nuclear Act and the role of nuclear energy in achieving decarbonization goals will continue to evolve, highlighting the complexities of energy regulation in Europe.