NYPD's secretive unit expands without transparency
- The Patrol Services Bureau Community Response Team, formed in 2022, addresses quality-of-life complaints including illegal vendors and mopeds.
- An investigation revealed significant secrecy around the team's operations, expanding from 16 to 165 members without clear public guidelines.
- Calls for enhanced transparency and public policies have emerged in response to the DOI's findings on the risks associated with the unit's lack of accountability.
In a recent investigation by the Department of Investigation, it was revealed that New York's Patrol Services Bureau Community Response Team (CRT) has been operating with significant secrecy since its formation in 2022. The CRT was established to address quality-of-life issues, including illegal mopeds, ghost cars, and unlicensed street vendors. Despite its significant growth from an initial 16 members to a current strength of 165, there has been a concerning lack of publicly available information regarding the unit's operations, goals, and accountability. Critics argue that this lack of transparency poses risks of legal non-compliance and potential ethical breaches in law enforcement practices. The inquiry specifically highlighted that the CRT lacks a formal mission statement and guidelines, which raises questions about the cohesion and direction of its operations. During the investigation, it became apparent that the unit does not appear on the NYPD's official website, further deepening concerns about its visibility to the public. DOI Inspector General Jeanene Barrett voiced her concern, stating that the absence of oversight increases the risk of adverse outcomes in policing. While the CRT is frequently mentioned in social media posts by officials, critics highlight that active efforts to ensure transparency are inadequate. Additionally, investigators found that no proper operating guide existed for recruiting officers into this specialized unit, which is an essential aspect of maintaining effective law enforcement practices. The NYPD struggled to provide investigators with essential data, such as 311 calls used to track community complaints, which underscores the lack of procedural integrity within the CRT. This report marked just the beginning of a series of ongoing investigations, with the DOI planning to explore disciplinary measures in the future. A spokesperson for the NYPD acknowledged the report and expressed their intention to review the recommendations thoroughly. In light of the findings, the Department of Investigation has suggested implementing public policies and protocols to improve the transparency and oversight of the Community Response Team. The aim is to build public confidence in the unit's mission and its operations moving forward. Overall, the implications of this report raise crucial questions about police practices and the complexities surrounding law enforcement accountability in urban settings, positioning the CRT at the center of an ongoing debate concerning police reform and community engagement in New York City.