Americans Turn to Zero-Calorie Sweeteners

Experts highlight the growing concern over excessive added sugar consumption among Americans, prompting many to seek alternatives in zero-calorie sweeteners. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has sanctioned six artificial sweeteners for food use, including saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, neotame, and advantame. Additionally, natural options like stevia and monk fruit extract, along with sugar alcohols such as erythritol, are also available. The FDA maintains that these sweeteners are safe for consumption when used in moderation. Despite their approval, recent media reports have sparked apprehension regarding the potential health risks associated with zero-calorie sweeteners. Concerns have emerged linking these additives to various health issues, including weight gain, heart disease, and even cancer. This has led to a growing debate about the long-term effects of these substitutes on public health. As consumers increasingly turn to these sweeteners to curb their sugar intake, questions about their safety and health implications remain prevalent. The FDA's stance on moderation suggests that while these sweeteners can be a viable alternative, they should not be consumed excessively. In light of these developments, CNN invites readers to share their questions regarding zero-calorie sweeteners, aiming to foster a better understanding of their role in diets and potential health impacts. The ongoing discourse underscores the need for further research and public awareness about the implications of these popular sugar substitutes.