US Hindus advocate for Modi government on Capitol Hill
- The Hindu American Foundation has been lobbying for the Indian government in the U.S., particularly since Modi's administration began.
- Concerns have been raised about HAF's potential classification as a foreign agent due to its political activities and ties to the Indian embassy.
- The situation highlights the complexities of foreign influence in U.S. politics and the implications for U.S.-India relations.
In the United States, the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) has been actively lobbying for the Indian government, particularly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration. This involvement raises questions about whether HAF should register as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) due to its political activities that align with the interests of a foreign principal. HAF's history of lobbying dates back to 2005 when Modi was denied a visa following interreligious violence in Gujarat. Despite claims of independence, many board members of HAF are also affiliated with the Hindu American Political Action Committee (HAPAC), which has contributed to political campaigns supporting Modi's government. During its annual Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill, HAF representatives met with numerous congressional offices to discuss various issues, including human rights concerns in India. The organization has faced scrutiny for its close ties with the Indian embassy and its lobbying efforts, which some argue could distort the portrayal of India's treatment of minorities. HAF maintains that it does not coordinate with the Indian government, despite the overlapping interests and relationships among its members. The ongoing debate about HAF's role highlights the complexities of foreign influence in U.S. politics, particularly regarding lobbying efforts that may not be fully transparent. As the organization continues to advocate for Modi's government, the implications for U.S.-India relations and the perception of India's domestic policies remain significant. The situation calls for a closer examination of the boundaries between domestic advocacy and foreign influence in political lobbying.