Sherwood drama sparks outrage over plot hole in Nottingham series
- The second season of the BBC drama series set in Nottingham introduces new families and explores a gangland war involving the Sparrows.
- Episode four focuses on Stephie, a young woman with Down's syndrome, whose family suffers due to gang violence, leading to her controversial placement in the care of her criminal cousins.
- Viewers have criticized the show for its unrealistic portrayal of social services and highlighted various plot holes, questioning the show's credibility.
The BBC drama series, which returned for its second season earlier this month, is set in Nottingham and draws inspiration from real-life murders that occurred in 2004. The latest episodes introduce new families and delve into an old gangland war involving the Sparrows, a crime clan linked to the first season's murders. Episode four centers on Stephie, a young woman with Down's syndrome, whose family has been devastated by violence related to gang conflicts. After her brother is jailed for killing a gangster's son, Stephie's adopted mother and uncle are murdered in retaliation. Viewers have expressed outrage over a significant plot hole regarding Stephie's care. Critics argue that it is unrealistic for a social worker to place her in the care of her criminal cousins, especially given her vulnerability. Many fans have taken to social media to voice their disbelief, stating that social services would never allow such a situation, highlighting the need for proper checks and protective measures for someone in her position. Despite the compelling narrative and strong performances, the series has faced scrutiny for various plot inconsistencies. Fans have pointed out anachronisms, such as the presence of modern technology in a story set in the mid-2000s, and questioned the police's failure to identify a mole within their ranks. These issues have led to discussions about the show's overall credibility and the effectiveness of its storytelling. The series, while gripping and engaging, has sparked debate among viewers regarding its realism and adherence to social service protocols, raising questions about the portrayal of vulnerable individuals in dramatic narratives.