Senators warn WNBA of antitrust violations over Connecticut Sun sale
- Connecticut's U.S. senators strongly criticized the WNBA's attempt to block the sale of the Connecticut Sun.
- The current team ownership is negotiating for state involvement to secure financial support for a minority stake.
- The actions of the WNBA could lead to significant legal repercussions under federal antitrust laws.
In recent developments, the WNBA's efforts to block the sale of the Connecticut Sun have attracted significant criticism at the federal level, particularly from Connecticut's U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy. The league's decision to reject a $325 million sale proposal and instead offer to buy the team for $250 million, with plans to relocate it away from Connecticut, has raised serious concerns about antitrust implications. Blumenthal emphasized that restricting the Mohegan Tribe's ability to choose its buyer could represent an unreasonable restraint of trade and violate federal antitrust laws. Murphy echoed these concerns, affirming that the decision lies with the tribe. The issues surfaced in light of the current ownership's exploration of a partnership with the state of Connecticut to secure a minority stake in the franchise. This plan aims to preserve the team's presence in the region while addressing logistical requirements for improved facilities. The Connecticut Sun has a history of engaging local fans, having previously hosted substantial events, making it critical that the franchise remains within the state to ensure its continued growth and success. Both senators highlighted the potential economic impacts of relocating the team, which would leave New England without a WNBA franchise, ultimately affecting local businesses and fans alike.