Jasmine Crockett compares ICE to slave patrols during MSNBC interview

In a recent MSNBC interview on September 14, 2025, Rep. Jasmine Crockett from Texas discussed the actions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), likening them to historical slave patrols. During her conversation with host Ali Velshi, she expressed concerns over the lack of accountability among ICE officers, claiming that their operations appeared to target American citizens indiscriminately. She argued that a re-evaluation of law enforcement practices was necessary, advocating for data-driven approaches to enhance public safety. Furthermore, Crockett downplayed the crime rates attributed to undocumented immigrants, asserting that white supremacists are responsible for a significantly higher percentage of violent crimes. Crockett's remarks draw attention to the ongoing debate over immigration policy and the role of law enforcement in the United States. By referencing the historical context of policing's roots in slave patrols, she aims to highlight the problematic nature of immigration enforcement practices today. This comparison spurred discussions about accountability within law enforcement, particularly as recent policies have allowed federal agents broader authority in immigration-related arrests. Furthermore, omission of extensive educational history regarding racial issues impedes public understanding and discourse around these important topics. The controversy escalated further as she recalled a tragic incident involving an illegal immigrant, noting that the focus on such cases often ignores the broader context of crime in the country. Crockett argues for a movement towards addressing crime through understanding facts and data rather than fear-mongering narratives that often disproportionately target immigrant communities. As she continues to vocalize her views, her position has made her a central figure in discussions regarding immigration reform and racial equity. Consequently, her remarks have sparked backlash and support alike, with various political figures weighing in on the implications of her statements. Supporters of her view advocate for systemic changes in immigration enforcement, while critics argue that such comparisons weaken the seriousness of real criminal issues. Amidst the polarized political climate surrounding immigration, the conversation inevitably pushes for a more profound reckoning with America’s history and present-day applications of law enforcement.