Daniel Penny faces trial after Jordan Neely's death from chokehold
- The trial centers around the choking incident that led to Jordan Neely's death in New York City's subway.
- Prosecutors argue that Daniel Penny used excessive force, holding Neely in a chokehold for nearly five minutes.
- The case raises significant questions about the use of force and the treatment of individuals experiencing mental health crises in public.
In New York City, the trial of Daniel Penny is nearing its conclusion after resuming following a Thanksgiving break. The case stems from an incident in which Jordan Neely died after Penny, a former Marine, placed him in a chokehold on a subway train. Prosecutors contend that Penny exerted excessive force and failed to recognize Neely's humanity, holding him in the chokehold for nearly five minutes after the train had stopped and other passengers were able to exit. Defense attorneys argue that Penny was acting out of a desire to protect passengers from Neely's purported threats of violence, specifically claims of wanting to kill. During the trial, video footage and eyewitness accounts were presented, including body camera footage from police who arrived at the scene after the incident. The prosecution emphasized the outcome of Neely's death as a homicide resulting from the chokehold, as established by the Chief Medical Examiner's autopsy report, while the defense insisted that Penny's actions were justifiable under the circumstances. Various testimonies highlighted the chaos on the subway and the confusion surrounding the events that led to Neely's death, with some witnesses expressing their concern for Neely's well-being but not being heard by Penny. The trial reflects broader societal concerns regarding the use of force, mental health, and the treatment of vulnerable individuals in public spaces, as both sides present their arguments in this high-profile case.