Is Mobility More Important than Density?

Urban planners and land-use experts often prioritize increasing density in cities, but there is a growing argument for enhancing mobility, particularly in terms of enabling people to relocate to areas with better opportunities. This perspective emphasizes the importance of 'foot voting,' where individuals choose to move to places that offer greater freedom and economic prospects. Historical trends in America, such as westward expansion, illustrate the significance of this type of mobility in shaping the nation’s success. The discussion also highlights the potential benefits of relaxing restrictions on urban density, which could lead to more affordable housing and increased living space per person. Contrary to concerns that higher density might lead to lower birth rates, the argument suggests that making housing more accessible could actually encourage pro-natalist outcomes. Additionally, the debate touches on the role of immigration in bolstering the construction workforce, which is crucial for expanding housing availability. By reducing immigration barriers, cities could see a rise in the number of workers available to build new homes, further alleviating housing shortages. Ultimately, while high-speed transportation options like rail systems are valued, the focus should be on enhancing the type of mobility that allows individuals to make choices about where to live based on their needs and aspirations. This approach could lead to more vibrant and economically diverse urban environments.