Far fewer newspapers are endorsing Harris than backed Clinton or Biden
- In 2024, approximately 80 newspapers endorsed Kamala Harris compared to over 240 for Hillary Clinton in 2016.
- The Los Angeles Times, historically a major supporter of Democratic candidates, chose not to endorse anyone this election cycle.
- The significant reduction in endorsements highlights a changing political atmosphere in U.S. journalism and voter alignment.
In the United States, newspaper endorsements for the Democratic presidential candidate have significantly declined since the last election cycle. In 2016, over 240 newspapers endorsed Hillary Clinton, while support for Kamala Harris in 2024 has plummeted to around 80 endorsements. Notably, major publications like the Los Angeles Times have opted not to endorse any candidates this year, representing a shift in editorial practices. The newspapers that have backed Harris include well-known outlets like the New York Times and the Boston Globe, indicating that although some support remains, it is considerably less than previous elections. Conversely, endorsements for Republican candidates have also decreased, with fewer than 10 newspapers supporting Trump in 2024. This marks a continuous trend that showcases changing political affiliations among U.S. newspapers, which historically endorsed candidates from aligned political parties. Several previously Republican-endorsing newspapers have also switched, heightening the trend of reduced endorsements for traditional Republican candidates. The overall decline in endorsements reflects broader shifts in public sentiment and editorial autonomy amidst the evolving landscape of American politics.