Pensioners challenge UK and Scottish governments over winter fuel payment cuts

In a significant legal challenge, two pensioners from Coatbridge, North Lanarkshire, are suing the Scottish and UK governments over the recent decision to cut the winter fuel payment. Peter and Florence Fanning have raised proceedings with the help of Govan Law Centre, arguing that the change to a means-tested benefit is unlawful. This shift mirrors a similar decision made by the UK government, which has raised concerns among pensioners about their welfare during the winter months. The judicial review has been filed at the Court of Session and requires a judge's approval to proceed. The Fannings assert that both governments failed to adequately consult with pensioners regarding the changes and did not conduct a comprehensive equality impact assessment. This lack of consultation is a central argument in their case, as it affects millions of individuals with protected characteristics, including age and disability. Former first minister Alex Salmond has supported the Fannings, emphasizing the potential consequences of the cut, including increased mortality among vulnerable pensioners. The Scottish government has defended its decision, citing budget constraints and the need to balance resources, while the UK government maintains that targeting support to those in greatest need is essential given the current financial situation. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for pensioners across the UK, potentially restoring the winter fuel payment to its previous universal status and ensuring that the voices of older citizens are heard in policy decisions that affect their lives.