Josh and Matt call for a ban on overhead lighting due to sensory issues
- Users on social media platforms have expressed dissatisfaction with overhead lighting, colloquially known as 'the big light.'
- Many young individuals argue that dim lighting from lamps is more comfortable and helps create a cosier environment.
- The debate illustrates generational shifts in domestic lighting preferences, with some calling for restrictions on overhead lighting.
In recent times, members of Generation Z have taken to social media platforms to express their aversion to overhead lighting, commonly referred to as the 'big light.' This trend has been particularly pronounced among TikTok users in Australia, where creators such as Josh and Matt have gained significant attention for advocating a ban on such lighting. They argue that overhead lighting creates a harsh environment that resembles a clinical setting, leading to discomfort and sensory overload, which many young adults consider to be almost abusive. Users have shared a range of opinions online, with some expressing strong dislike for the big light and others insisting on its practicality. For some individuals, particularly those in bright, well-lit environments, the absence of such lighting leads to distress and difficulty in seeing clearly. Various commenters highlighted their contrasting views, with some stating that dim lighting creates a cosy and relaxing atmosphere compared to the stark illumination of overhead lights. The dialog surrounding the use of overhead lighting reflects broader generational shifts in preferences related to home comfort and aesthetics, signifying a pivotal change in societal norms surrounding domestic environments. In conclusion, while some members of Gen Z advocate for a relaxing, dimly lit space with the use of lamps, others remain firm in their need for bright, functional lighting to navigate their homes effectively.