Church faces backlash as former Archbishop George Carey faces disciplinary action

In recent months, the Church of England has grappled with significant scrutiny regarding its handling of sexual abuse allegations, raising serious questions about accountability among its clergy. An independent investigation known as the Makin review uncovered that Lord George Carey, who served as Archbishop from 1991 to 2002, failed to act upon revelations of serial abuse committed by John Smyth, a volunteer at Christian summer camps. This report highlighted the Church's knowledge of Smyth's abusive behavior towards over 100 young boys and men, while also indicating that Carey had been made aware of the allegations but denied having seen prior documentation concerning the abuse. As a result of these findings, Carey was identified among several clergy facing potential disciplinary measures for safeguarding failures. Alongside him, nine other clergy members are also under investigation. This punitive response follows Carey's resignation from priestly duties in December, prompted by media criticisms of his allowance for the Rev. David Tudor to return to the priesthood despite being previously banned over sexual abuse claims. Carey's previous resignation had come when he faced grave criticism for failing to report multiple sex abuse allegations against Bishop Peter Ball during his time as Archbishop. The Church has emphasized a commitment to addressing the recommendations derived from the independent review, underscoring the need to foster accountability and support for the victims of abuse. Alexander Kubeyinje, the national director of safeguarding for the Church of England, expressed deep regret for the harm endured by survivors of Smyth's abuse, reaffirming the Church's determination to address the review's findings seriously. Another notable figure who has faced criticism in this unfolding scandal is Justin Welby, the Church's former head, who was implicated in the report for his decision not to inform the police about allegations against Smyth. While disciplinary proceedings may be initiated, the Church is navigating complex legal and institutional challenges. The prospects of these proceedings being effective are uncertain, especially as they are described as 'out of time' by church officials, necessitating permission from relevant tribunals to proceed. This situation continues to evolve, reflecting broader issues of accountability and safeguarding within the institution. As the Church moves forward, the focus remains on addressing the failings exposed by the review and ensuring that victims are at the forefront of the response.