K-pop fans protest return of member with funeral wreaths
- Hundreds of funeral wreaths were sent to SM Entertainment by K-pop fans protesting the return of member Hong Seunghan.
- The use of funeral wreaths for protests began in 2006 but has since shifted towards targeting artists for personal choices.
- These actions have raised concerns over bullying and mental health impacts within the K-pop industry.
In South Korea, the use of funeral wreaths as a form of protest has evolved significantly from its original purpose. Although these floral tributes were initially adopted in 2006 to express dissent against governmental actions, they have increasingly become tools for K-pop fans to express their disapproval of artists’ decisions. Earlier this year, fans of a boy band managed by SM Entertainment flooded the company's headquarters with funeral wreaths. This protest aimed to express their displeasure over the controversial return of band member Hong Seunghan. The protests not only drew attention to internal conflicts within fandom communities but also sparked wider discussions about the ramifications of such displays on individuals' mental health and the impact of toxic fandom culture on young artists. As of October 2024, messages accompanying the wreaths included demands for Seunghan to leave the group and questioned his identity. This method of protest underscores the deep emotional investment fans have in K-pop and the drastic measures they are willing to take to influence decisions affecting their favorite groups. Additionally, the controversy surrounding these protests has led to statements from public figures condemning the wreaths, with one former band member, Park Jae-hyung, labeling the actions as akin to bullying and an extreme form of disapproval. The discussions around this issue have also prompted South Korean authorities to recognize funeral wreaths as a legal method of protest, complicating the response to such displays. Despite being permissible in the eyes of the law, the presence of these wreaths has disrupted public spaces and made local residents uneasy, further adding to the debate over the fine line between legitimate protest and harmful behavior.