CNN settles costly defamation lawsuit after Alex Marquardt's report
- Alex Marquardt's reporting led to a defamation lawsuit from Zachary Young, a U.S. Navy veteran.
- Following a jury ruling against CNN, the network reached an undisclosed settlement with Young.
- Marquardt's departure is seen as a direct consequence of the costly trial and ensuing controversies.
In the U.S., Alex Marquardt, chief national security correspondent for CNN, departed the network after an eight-year tenure marked by controversy surrounding a defamation case. The lawsuit, initiated by U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young, followed a report by Marquardt that stated Young exploited vulnerable Afghan individuals amid the chaotic withdrawal of American forces. In January 2023, a jury ruled that CNN had defamed Young and allowed him to seek punitive damages. The case's details revealed deeper editorial conflicts within the network, leading to an undisclosed settlement just before the jury could decide the punitive damages to be imposed. The jury awarded Young $5 million in damages for the harm to his reputation and livelihood as a result of the report. CNN maintained that the report was factual, despite acknowledging several internal communications from Marquardt and other staff members that appeared to disparage Young. The internal messages, which referred to Young in derogatory terms, severely impacted the trial's outcome, painting Marquardt in a predominantly negative light. Following the trial, CNN issued an on-air apology in 2022, yet many involved in the trial believed it was insufficient and simply a legal maneuver to shield the network from further liability. As the court case progressed, tensions flared surrounding the editorial standards at CNN, with insiders indicating that Marquardt's departure was evidently linked to the fallout from the defamation trial. The network’s decision to part ways with him came after a review of his actions and decisions regarding the report. Marquardt publicly acknowledged his exit on social media, expressing gratitude for the time spent with CNN. Marquardt had previously served in various roles across the network and was known for his insightful reporting. However, the limit of tolerance for editorial disagreements and the repercussions of the defamation trial marked a turning point. CNN spokespersons indicated support for Marquardt during his continued appearances on air prior to his departure. Still, the internal review appeared to underscore a shift in how the network handles cases of this nature and the expectations set for its journalists moving forward. CNN has reiterated its commitment to responsible reporting, highlighting the need for reflection and improvement following this incident.