Kellogg proposes partitioning Ukraine like post-war Berlin

In an interview, Keith Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general and special envoy for Ukraine from the Trump administration, proposed that Ukraine could be partitioned similarly to Berlin after World War II. This plan consists of establishing zones of control for British and French troops in the western part of Ukraine, while Russian forces would occupy the east. This division would also involve Ukrainian forces positioned between the British and French troops and the Russian army, as well as a proposed demilitarized zone to prevent conflicts. Kellogg emphasized that this arrangement would help ensure true military oversight and stability in the region. The idea of a partition raises significant concerns in Kyiv, as it implies surrendering eastern territories currently under Russian control. Kellogg has previously stated that the inclusion of allied forces would not be provocative to Russia, suggesting that the positioning of these forces is strategically designed to maintain peace and stability in Ukraine. Although Kellogg's proposal may have tactical merit, his comparisons to post-war arrangements in Berlin have drawn criticism and may not resonate well with Ukrainian leaders, who fear losing essential territory. The proposal comes amid ongoing tensions in Ukraine, with Russian drone strikes resulting in casualties and damage to Ukrainian infrastructure. Kellogg's plan is seen as part of a broader negotiation effort by the United States to reach a ceasefire, which includes direct discussions between Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Kremlin representatives have consistently rejected the notion of peacekeeping troops from NATO countries, complicating the potential for this peace deal in the face of rising violence and aggressions. While Kellogg's suggestion aims to create a framework for peace, it raises further questions about the future of Ukraine; implementing this plan could set a dangerous precedent for other nations under similar threats. Observers in Ukraine and abroad will be keen to see how U.S. diplomacy unfolds in the context of these proposals, especially considering the complex geopolitical implications of redefining territorial boundaries and the accountability and legitimacy of Ukraine’s leadership moving forward.