How a school mock election in Britain launched powerful sisters Rachel and Ellie Reeves
- In 1992, Rachel Reeves ran in a school mock election, with her sister Ellie as her campaign manager.
- The economic crisis during the early 90s influenced their political views and led them to join the Labour Party as teenagers.
- Today, Rachel serves as Chancellor of the Exchequer and Ellie as chair of the Labour Party, marking them as significant figures in British politics.
In 1992, during a tumultuous period for the Labour Party, a mock election at Cator Park School for Girls in Beckenham became a pivotal moment for two future political leaders, Rachel and Ellie Reeves. At just 13 years old, Rachel ran for election, with Ellie serving as her campaign manager. This experience foreshadowed their later roles in politics, as both sisters would eventually rise to significant positions within the Labour Party. Rachel now serves as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, while Ellie holds the position of Labour Party chair. The political landscape at the time was marked by economic turmoil, with the Conservative government facing a crisis that affected many families, including the Reeves. High interest rates and economic instability shaped their early political views, as they witnessed their mother meticulously managing household finances amidst financial strain. This environment influenced their eventual alignment with the Labour Party, which they joined as teenagers in the mid-1990s. Despite their impressive political careers, the sisters maintain a sense of humility regarding their achievements. Ellie has expressed surprise at being labeled as part of 'Britain's most powerful sister act,' emphasizing that their upbringing was not steeped in political fervor. Their father, a teacher and union member, encouraged them to form their own political beliefs rather than imposing his views. The Reeves sisters' journey from a school mock election to the upper echelons of British politics illustrates how formative experiences can shape future leaders, highlighting the importance of personal and economic circumstances in their political development.